The Society says, that they will ask for a Yes with comments because they find it very important that some of the serious faults in the specification from you-know-who are corrected.
The Danish IT Society is one of the members in S-142/U-34 technical committee under Danish Standards.
This position has already been criticized by another organization OSL (The Danish Open Source Business Association) in the same magazine. OSL is also member of the technical committee. OSL makes some kind of a fool of the Society, when they says:
You have misunderstood the rules for votingAnd it is a fact, that it is possible to vote Yes with comments but in the fast-track the comment will be trashed.
The Society is also the managing institution in Denmark behind the European Computer Drivers License witch has actually become a M$ Drivers license in Denmark. Today it's not possible to take that drivers license without being tested in the use of products from you-know-who.
I don't mind that people, companies and organizations takes a stand on subjects like standards and so, but they shouldn't claim to be neutral when they are not. The society enjoys a virtual monopoly on the marked for certification and education and shouldn't use their own marked position to support another monopoly.
"And it is a fact, that it is possible to vote Yes with comments but in the fast-track the comment will be trashed."
ReplyDeleteI can't see why any rational player can vote anything but No with comments if there are comments. Hope the problems will not be resolved by ECMA, because when you look at their past response to issues you clearly see that ECMA is no trustworthy organisation.